Date Received: 2015-10-21
Issue: Settlement process and costs
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: My property was sold on XXXXXXXX2015 after 120 days sending documents to SPS servicer train to qualify for a lone modification., at the same time the bank, SPS servicer continue with the Foreclosure presiding 's, ( Dual Tracking ) at the foreclosure the SPS did not claim as Defendant my wife in the complaint and did not server any liss pendis documents to her, violation of state constitutional law .Art X, & XXXX, Fla.Const ; XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX ). the y have violated her rights to due proses and have violate her XXXX amendment constitutional right., I have file in civil court a Objection to sale, and to the bank SPS servicer a Appeal under the settlement agreement
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
State: FL
Zip: 33186
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-10-21
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-10-20
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: I have been trying for the last 18 months to get a loan modification from SPS who is the servicing for XXXX. I have faxed and mailed documents to them for at least 12 months now. I have predotory lenders still on my account that should have been removed since 2009. My interest rate is over 12 percent. Sps has been given me the run around.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
State: PA
Zip: 19119
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-10-20
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-10-20
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: SPSAccount # XXXXI am writing this letter to request that you remove the late payments and the negative items reporting to thee credit bureaus. I know it is your power to do so via theFair Credit Reporting Act. Speaking with the lawyers and the closing company it is standard via a short sale package for the creditor to remove all negative trade lines and stop reporting to the credit bureaus. I am selling via short sale with your approval. I need to put this short sale hind me and move on. I am requesting that you remove all negative payments and stop reporting the trade line altogether and not report the short sale. There are several letters requesting the same in the short sale package and it had stop being reported but now the debt is being reported again XXXX. I am sure this is an oversight. I am now attempting to improve my credit score, but am having difficultly due to the negative listing on my credit report. Therefore, I respectfully request that you remove this negative listing from my report as a gesture of goodwill. XXXX XXXX
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
State: VA
Zip: 22408
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-10-20
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-10-19
Issue: Settlement process and costs
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: I have filed multiple complaints against Select Portfolio Services XXXX the most recent is case number XXXX ) and they refuse to even research the allegations against XXXX XXXX, the original lender. They state categorically that funds in my modification were not used to pay off XXXX Mortgage because there is no written record in the modification that XXXX did. I have requested and XXXX Mortgage is in the process of providing me documentatyion that XXXX did indeed pay off XXXX XXXX XXXX is to send me a copy of the bank wire from XXXX as well as the payoff letter that was faxed to XXXX, complete with XXXX 's fax number on it. I will provide this documentation as soon as I receive it from XXXX Mortgage, and it will prove that while XXXX was not listed as being paid off, funds from XXXX that were included in my modification were used to pay off XXXX. To assert that my loan balance increased over {$50000.00} due to accrued interest, etc is absurd in itself when the original loan was only around {$35000.00}! Again, I request that the CFPB requires SPS to do honest research and in doing so will see that what I am saying is true.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
State: TN
Zip: 37129
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-10-19
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-10-18
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: XXXX XXXX, XXXX I would like to file a complaint against US.bank, who sold the property to a third property, but when the home was foreclosed, I did n't find out that USbank had any interest until I received an unlawful detainer and USbank was at the top of the list. When the home was foreclosed, it did n't sell at auction, and reverted back to the bank, but nobody would say which bank. When I received the unlawful detainer, I immediately went to a local branch located @ XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, CA XXXX, I spoke with the branch manger ( XXXX XXXX ) on several occasions from XXXX XXXX, until as recent as XXXX XXXX and while I was there he would call the back office, and USbank would never acknowledge ownership, nor could they identify me by account number, address, or social security number, yet the third party speculator claims they purchased the property from them. I went to XXXX to help me through the process and on paper it was made look like US.Bank was the highest bidder, but that 's not the case, it reverted back to the bank, and I recently have documentation from XX/XX/XXXX ( Enclosed ) where USbank is affixed at the top of the list. I would like to discover why they could never identify me, and banks are allowed to play this game of keep away from distressed homeowners trying to reach out to save their properties. I am contending that USbank sold a property that they had no right to sell, they know that and if I just give up, they win. I want this investigated ; I should at least be given the right to a jury trial.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
State: CA
Zip: 94124
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-10-21
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: Yes
Date Received: 2015-10-16
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: I recently read the article about the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in XXXX magazine. We are involved in a unique and complicated situation and are not sure what direction to take. We are currently involved in a residential mortgage situation that began with refinancing both our residential property as well as a rental home with XXXX the fall of XXXX with a three year ARM. XX/XX/XXXX XXXX was purchased by XXXX XXXX XXXX and our servicing agent changed. Our payment went to the old servicing agent 's address and was sent back to us. The new serving agent began adding late payment fees and would not accept our payment, telling us that we were already in the foreclosure process. We felt that we had no choice but to file Chapter XXXX XX/XX/XXXX to stop the foreclosure process and protect our home and rental property. We had our case dismissed XX/XX/XXXX. When we received our first communication from the servicer after dismissing our case, we realized that the servicer failed to adjust our interest rate on XXXX properties XX/XX/XXXX, and that the XXXX index rates had actually gone down which would have significantly decreased our payments prior to our decision to file Chapter XXXX. Had we known this it might have affected our decision. In addition, the servicer failed to adjust our rate every year after that, and again, the rates have fallen each year. After numerous inquiries, the servicer made the first ARM adjustment in XXXX XXXX and even that interest rate was calculated incorrectlyWe have all the basic mortgage fraud issues including original loan not endorsed, mysterious mortgage assignment recorded many years after the XXXX was created, endless loan modification applications, multiple mortgage servicer changes and harassment/threats to foreclose on us. We have been pursuing resolution to the overpayment and the correct mortgage interest rate since XXXX. I have kept detailed records of all correspondence and have all issues outlined in a timeline summary. We have never been late or missed a mortgage payment in fifteen years until we re-financed with XXXX in XXXX. We had excellent credit and we believe our mortgage was added to the original XXXX pool because of our high XXXX score to increase the " average '' XXXX score of the pool. Our income has always been high enough to afford the mortgage payment and our house is worth more than the mortgage note. The servicer XXXX s ) keep sending modification offers to us even though we do not qualify for the modification program. There seems to be an endless back and forth between us and the servicers for each property. We continue to write letters asking direct questions that go unanswered. We have recently authorized our attorney to pursue legal action against the servicers and lenders for XXXX properties. The servicer 's response on our rental property was to file foreclosure in XXXX XXXX in the name of the trustee " XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. ". A copy of our answer and counter claim is attached to our complaint. Thank you for time and consideration.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
State: OH
Zip: 452XX
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-10-16
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: Yes
Date Received: 2015-10-16
Issue: Credit decision / Underwriting
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: XXXXThis is my number which has the wrong bank name on it. I was never a customer of XXXX XXXX XXXX, that was my mother 's bank which I was writing about. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc. Account number XXXX is the bank at this moment. My home on their BPO is worth about XXXX. I have a deferred amount of XXXX, XXXX that is supposed to be paid back in 25 years. Which is not what I was told by XXXX on XX/XX/2014 This deferred amount was to be removed from the mortgage amount. XXXX, who had a suit won against them, sold my mortgage to XXXX who then sold it to Select Portfolio Servicing Inc . Somehow after speaking with XXXX, XXXX and Portfolio Inc. The documents for my deferred payment forgiven has been lost or somehow not attached to my file. The bank got a bail out and I am still stuck with a mortgage of XXXX and the house is worth only XXXX or less. Now Select Portfolio is saying I can get help through XXXX a new program that will give me XXXX to move. So why would I leave my home for XXXX when I have a mortgage payment of 2 %. If they are right they would remove the XXXX deferment
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
State: IL
Zip: 60443
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-10-16
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: Yes
Date Received: 2015-10-15
Issue: Incorrect information on credit report
Subissue: Public record
Consumer Complaint: my ex-husband is responsible for the refinancing of all past due and all outstanding payments of mortgage as per divorce documents
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
State: AL
Zip: 350XX
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-10-19
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-10-14
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: We had have a mortgage for our home in Florida since XXXX. We were not able to make our payments and entered into foreclosure proceeding in Florida Court. We went through many attempts to modify the mortgage. In XXXX of XXXX we were offered a modification that we accepted. We made the payments required. In XXXX of XXXX the servicing company made a offer of a permanent modification that was NOT as offered under the proposed modification. We made it clear that we would not accept the permanent modification as offered. We sent them a letter to that effect. We also sent them a counter offer to their proposed permanent modification that more closely reflected the modification that was originally offered. They signed the counter offer and returned it to us. The foreclosure action was dismissed and the law firm that represented the mortgage investor/servicer sent us the modification via email along with sending it to us via XXXX Mail. Since the servicer has ignored the modification that we agreed to and is servicing the account as if we had signed the original modification as offered. They have acknowledged that the modification they are servicing under is not the modification the parties agreed to and signed saying we fraudulently and unilaterally altered the agreement, even thought they do not dispute that the agreement they signed and returned is the agreement we signed and sent to them. We did make changes to the agreement and sent it back to them, we told them we were going to, we told them we did XXXX Section XXXX paragraph H, attached modification agreement ) and they agreed to it in the modification as executed between the parties. Further they agree and acknowledge that the agreement that are servicing under is not he agreement they or we signed XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX letter attached ) and they are fraudulently and unilaterally servicing under an agreement we do not have and was never agreed to.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
State: FL
Zip: 33837
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-10-14
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: Yes
Date Received: 2015-10-12
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: SPS, Select Portfolio Servicing , INC, a mortgage servicer, servicing loans in California is refusing to comply with HAMP modification guidelines. They have received a complete modification package on this file several times. They assure a response within 30 days. Thay have NEVER responded in writing as to a resolution to the file. They ask that we start all over because they did NOT review the file in a timely manner. I have submitted FOUR separate COMPLETE applications, and not once have they approved or denied in writing ....
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
State: CA
Zip: 90275
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-10-14
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: Yes