Date Received: 2016-08-16
Issue: Balance transfer
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: I used a convenient check to transfer a balance to my KeyBank credit card in XXXX 2016. The check and promotion flyer indicate that the check needed to be used by XXXX/XXXX/16 to qualify for the promotion. The check was used with another provided in the amount of {$9300.00} and posted on XXXX/XXXX/16 to the account. KeyBank processed the payment in their system on XXXX/XXXX/16, resulting in them not applying the promotional APR of 0 % or the balance transfer fee of 3 %. Instead, I incurred a balance transfer fee of 4 % and have incurred a monthly APR of 11.24 % for XXXX and XXXX. I originally called on XXXX/XXXX/16, spoke with XXXX, and was told that the check had to be processed by KeyBank by XXXX/XXXX/16, not that the check had to be used by XXXX/XXXX/16. I asked for a review of my account to reconsider since their flyer states the convenience check needs to be used by XXXX/XXXX/16 and the transaction must post by XXXX/XXXX/16. I was provided a ticket number and told I would receive response within XXXX5 business days via cell phone or my mail. I placed a followup call on XXXX/XXXX/16, spoke with XXXX, and was told there was no response available and that the original supervisor who created the ticket would need to look into and call me back. I was promised a call back on XXXX/XXXX/16. I placed a second followup call on XXXX/XXXX/16, spoke with XXXX again, and was told there was still no response to the ticket. I requested that XXXX look into the issue and call me back since XXXX had not called me back after XXXX phone calls. I was told I would receive a phone call back with a status. I still have not received a call back or a response via mail. In the mean time, I have incurred fees that I believe are incorrect and should be reviewed totaling {$250.00} as follows : monthly interest in XXXX ( {$86.00} ) and XXXX XXXX {$74.00} ) along with a convenient check fee of 4 % ( XXXX ) instead of 3 % ( {$270.00} ). KeyBank is clearly not going to resolve the issue despite numerous followup calls on my part.
Company Response:
State: CO
Zip: 80104
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2016-08-16
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with monetary relief
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2016-08-14
Issue: Dealing with my lender or servicer
Subissue: Received bad information about my loan
Consumer Complaint: Key Bank reported forgiveness of student loans to me as cosigner, which would be reported as my income to the IRS on Form XXXX. This process is a duplicate of the same forgiveness in 2011 for which I have the Form XXXX reported then.
Company Response:
State: IN
Zip: 47906
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2016-08-16
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2016-08-13
Issue: Deposits and withdrawals
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: were locked out our online banking account w/o notification. KeyBank has a new webpage and did n't advise its customers. We did not receive any notification and thought the site as a phising scam site. So we did n't logged in and tried to log in again and were locked out. We tired to call and waiting twice once 25 minutes and then 20 minutes no customer service available. XXXX saturday XXXX. Called local branch and manager-XXXX ny was unaware of new webpage and also locked out of her account. We are concerned and alarmed about our money and This has caused XXXX not knowing whats going on? KeyBank has failed to advise customers of changes and customer service is unavailable to rectify my issue. KeyBank arrogance snubbing their nose at regulators and its customers is concerning and alarming.
Company Response:
State: NY
Zip: 142XX
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2016-08-13
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2016-08-13
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: Fraud and misrepresentation on behalf of KeyBank ; KeyBank last year filed erroneously and egregiously against me a Notice of Election and Demand on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. KeyBank on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX sent to me a letter of apology and admitting to its errors in refusing payments, charging of late fees, attorney 's fees, etc., etc. KeyBank accepted in a full and final payment made by me to KeyBank 's attorney of record of an agreed to sum on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX and which brought the loan current. Nevertheless that negligence on the part of KeyBank caused me XXXX, cost an inordinate amount of time to address, attorney 's fees, filing fees, derogatory reporting to credit agencies resulting in damage to my credit, etc., etc. This is now occurring again! KeyBank is threating a foreclosure action and acceleration of the loan. Further, there are now reflected substantial late fees and attorney 's fees which I have no intention of paying whatsoever. Again, KeyBank / a large bank is strong-arming a small borrower with a seasoned payment record for over 11 years! And notwithstanding that the negligent party is KeyBank! I am now beyond upset. I am not attempting to make further payments only to be refused and until such time that KeyBank straightens out their accounting of my account and provides me with statements that are 100 % accurate. I am also filing appropriate complaints with the appropriate agencies and discussing with my legal counsel formal actions against KeyBank.
Company Response:
State: CO
Zip: 80207
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2016-08-13
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with monetary relief
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: Yes
Date Received: 2016-08-10
Issue: Deposits and withdrawals
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: Received a {$50.00} check drawn on Key Bank ( routing # XXXX ) which I presented for payment XXXX XXXX, 2016 in their XXXX, OR branch. They refused to honor/cash the check unless I paid a {$5.00} fee. Is this legal? I deposited the check into my financial institution.
Company Response:
State: OR
Zip: 97128
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2016-08-10
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2016-08-09
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: The borrower has been trying to get a modification on her XXXX mortgage for over a year. KeyBank keeps sent her a denial on XXXX XXXX indicating that she did not qualify, but did not provide sufficient detail as to why she did n't qualify or what options are generally available. The borrower appealed the decision, but KeyBank denied her appeal without explanation.
Company Response:
State: NY
Zip: 10451
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2016-08-11
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2016-08-10
Issue: Closing/Cancelling account
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: On or around XXXX/XXXX/XXXX i contacted Key Bank to remove myself as an authorized user on a friends credit card account. In XXXX XXXX I was assigned account number XXXX. The Bank did remove me as an authorized user on the referenced account, but is showing non willful compliance to have this account removed completely from all XXXX credit bureaus. I sent a credit bureau dispute form to Key Banks Credit Research team and was told that they will not be removing this account from credit report and it will remain 7-10 years. I am in the middle of purchasing a home and with this showing on my credit, it has affected my chances for loan approval. Key Bank supervisors show no compliance. Key Bank under federal law must remove an account from credit report in which the account does not belong. Every other bank has honored my request and has fulfilled the federal law requirements
Company Response:
State: OH
Zip: 45373
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2016-08-10
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2016-08-03
Issue: Can't repay my loan
Subissue: Can't decrease my monthly payments
Consumer Complaint: My hours were reduced at work last year, so I requested a graduated loan repayment option. My job was recently terminated, so I could not afford the graduated payment amounts. The loan holder insists they can not provide me with any other options to reduce my monthly payments, as private loans do n't qualify for the IBR program ( as do federal loans ) ; and they ca n't purchase student loans, so they ca n't refinance or consolidate the loans.
Company Response:
State: NM
Zip: 88001
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2016-08-03
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2016-08-01
Issue: Dealing with my lender or servicer
Subissue: Having problems with customer service
Consumer Complaint: I, XXXX XXXX, signed my mother 's signature XXXX XXXX for a loan in 2007 that I received during my attendance of school. XXXX XXXX spoke with Key Bank, after discovering on her credit reports, which I was informed they were extremely rude and nasty about the matter that is why she resulted to complaining to the CFPB. I also contacted Key Bank and provided a letter informing Key Bank that I am completely liable for this loan. I am also attaching XXXX of the credit reports my mother provided me, showing that Key Bank has the XXXX account listed on her credit reports three times. She indicated Key Bank has it listed like that on all her credit reports. I signed for XXXX loan with them, so they should not be reporting the account as Key Bank XXXX under account number XXXX, then same account ACS-Key Bank account number XXXX, then a third time Key Bk XXXX. These XXXX accounts are the same XXXX account and my mother has notified them and they still display it as XXXX accounts on her credit reports. Key Bank is dishonest in saying that they tried to contact my mother with no avail, she spoke to their fraud dept. told me that is how they obtained her address in which they did not have. She provided her signature over and over to show that is not her signature, which she is correct, it is mine, XXXX XXXX. I have attached new information and previous information submitted by XXXX XXXX, that she provided me. She informed she is not only mentally exhausted but this stress has taken a massive impact on her health in which I am totally apologetic for. My mother is in the process of obtaining legal representation for Key Bank 's refusal to delete and for reporting the same account three times on her credit reports. Key Bank 's refusal to acknowledge that they have received the documentation to support this debt does not belong to XXXX XXXX. She also said she was baffled why they did not contact her as she has a fraud alert before allowing me the loan. XXXX XXXX never had any knowledge, never received any documents or signed nor did she receive any benefits in regards to the loan. As I have admitted prior, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX is solely liable. My mother has been through more than enough turmoil. As she stated prior she was dealing with my father and only sibling battling with XXXX and I did not want to ask her to sign for the student loan, so I signed, which I had no right or permission to sign my mother 's name XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX or provide her information.
Company Response:
State: FL
Zip: 33311
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2016-08-01
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: Yes
Date Received: 2016-07-29
Issue: Deposits and withdrawals
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: I do n't understand why each time I use the drive-thru service, the waiting time is greater than 20 minutes and longer. This happens even if I am the only one in line or not. I witnessed so many vehicles leave after waiting so long. Customer services is so poor. I push the button for service and have been told the line inside is too long and I have to wait. The wait is too long. Please help the customers in the drive-thru line with this on-going problem. Thank you.
Company Response:
State: OH
Zip: 432XX
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2016-08-03
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No