Date Received: 2015-12-08
Issue: False statements or representation
Subissue: Attempted to collect wrong amount
Consumer Complaint: We received a letter from Select Portfolio Servicing , Inc. dated XXXX XXXX, 2015 which is an invitation to a Free Homeownership Preservation Event at XXXX in XXXX, NY. We will not be attending the event. We are not a customer of Select Portfolio Servicing and deny any contractual or other relationship with your organization. As SPS knows or should know, we have written previously informing SPS that there is no delinquency. We have disputed the debt -- as well as the authority of SPS to act in any capacity in regard to the alleged account number they reference. We have disputed this debt ; therefore, until affirmatively validated, SPS knows or should know their information concerning this alleged debt is inaccurate. Thus, since they have already reported this debt to any credit-reporting agency ( CRA ) or Credit Bureau ( CB ) then, they must immediately inform them of our dispute with this debt. We have received a copy of such report from Experian where SPS still lists the debt as a mortgage debt. Reporting information that SPS knows to be inaccurate or failing to report information correctly violates the Fair Credit Reporting Act1681s-2. SPS continues to persist in pursuing collection efforts without validating this debt, we are herewith informing SPS of another complaint that will be filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau based on their failure to comply with the FDCPA, Section 809. SPS has admitted that it is not the servicer of this account or any account in connection with us ; that it is only attempting to collect an alleged debt based on " servicing rights '' ; that SPS has made contractual arrangements with other parties for their own profit ; that SPS has harassed us and continues to harass us ; that SPS has not proved and is unable to prove that we owe any debt.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
State: NY
Zip: 105XX
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-12-08
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: Yes
Date Received: 2015-12-08
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: With full XXXX party authorization from my client who is the seller in a short sale, I instituted a sale of the concerned home. Mortgage service company has used numerous delay process and has ignored all documentation and request from the seller. Time is of the essence whereby the buyer of the home will abandon the sales process if short sale approval is not obtained.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
State: NY
Zip: 105XX
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-12-08
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-12-07
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: Select Portfolio Servicing Inc. is my servicer. XXXX XXXX is the note holder. In XX/XX/XXXX we applied and submitted for a Loan Modification on our XXXX, Owner Occupied Home. We were granted a modification in XX/XX/XXXX. We signed and returned the modification agreement, as did our servicer. In XXXX, the servicer unilaterally attempted to change the terms of the modification. Our payment would rise and our Balloon Payment was going to rise from {$200000.00} to over {$800000.00}. We have refused to accept the change as it is NOT beneficial. Recently, Select Portfolio Servicing refused to take our payments and attempted to foreclose on the property. We have reached out to them on a constant and consistent basis. We requested a review on XX/XX/XXXX and were given a 45 day window for a resolution. It has been over 50 days and they have NOT responded in any way. They continue to add late fees even though we have been current since the modification. The Servicer has verbally responded that they will NOT honor the signed modification from XX/XX/XXXX, given that we did NOT accept their revised modification offer. They have NOT furnished their response in writing nor in a timely manner. We informed them that we will be filing a complaint against them.
Company Response: Company believes complaint is the result of an isolated error
State: CA
Zip: 90605
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-12-07
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with non-monetary relief
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-12-03
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: I have successfully gain a loan modification now over 6 months with Select Portfolio Servicing ( SPS ) through the assistance with XXXX XXXX Law Offices. I have documentation of the completion of the loan modification process and closing. I have abled my trust and confidence to re-establish creditworthiness with SPS and agreed to the terms of the contract, loan restructure and acknowledgements thereof. SPS states to me after I successfully completed the process only after my inquiry because of my BK filing 8 years ago ( discharged ) that they are not required to report and have no intentions on reporting my monthly payment history according to the current agreement. This was my last conversation I had along with a third party ( XXXX XXXX XXXX ) at Law Offices to speak with SPS authorized to speak on my behalf. I find this to be a major setback, not able to regain and build my credit and it restricts me from my efforts in paying on time and agreed. I absolutely love the new loan and the fresh start and feel I 'm getting robbed of the benefit of paying as agreed. I would like resolution for SPS to report my pay history to the bureaus each month according to how I am paying. If this can not be achieved, I am open to other options, ie stated letter every 3 months of my pay history so I can forward to the XXXX credit bureaus so they will be updated.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
State: IL
Zip: 604XX
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-12-03
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-12-02
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: I currently am in review for a loan modification with my mortgage company " Select Portfolio Servicing ''. I also have a foreclosure sale date scheduled on XXXX/XXXX/15 and need help getting is pushed back. All information has been provided to SPS but they still have not pushed the sale back and I am in jeopardy of losing my home to foreclosure. Please help me in any way possible to ensure the sale doesnt take place.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
State: CA
Zip: 90047
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-12-02
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-12-01
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: I have requested several times to have PMI removed off of this loan. My LTV is below the requirement and they refuse to remove.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
State: TX
Zip: 75089
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-12-01
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: Yes
Date Received: 2015-12-01
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: I purchased a house with my husband in XX/XX/XXXX. He refinanced the mortgage without my knowledge in XX/XX/XXXX. He moved out and stopped paying the loan, forcing me to make payments from early withdrawals from my IRA. I requested a XXXX from the loan servicing company for tax purposes, but was denied this on the grounds that my name is not on the note.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
State: NJ
Zip: 070XX
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-12-01
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-12-01
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: I applied for assistance in saving my home with my servicer SPS. I hired an attorney to assist me with the process. On XXXX XXXX, 2015 I was denied for a loan modification. However, the lender missed part of my income in the review. My denial letter offered me 30 days to appeal the decision. My attorney submitted an appeal in writing to SPS on XXXX XXXX, 2015. I have attached the email confirmation showing my attorney sent the appeal and all corresponding documentation on XXXX XXXX, 2015 at XXXX. I have also attached my attorney 's internal notes where they called and confirmed my appeal was received and under review on XXXX XXXX, 2015 at XXXX. SPS issued me a letter on XXXX XXXX, 2015 ( See Attached ) - letter dated XXXX XXXX, 2015 - stating that my appeal was denied due to the appeal was not received within the 30 days after the denial. My attorney contacted SPS and SPS states that they are refusing to review the appeal because they did not receive the appeal in the 30 day period after the denial. My attorney advised them we have confirmation the appeal was in fact received by them on XXXX XXXX, 2015 at XXXX. SPS states their computer system takes up to three days for it to show up on their side so that was after the 30 days was up and therefore they are not willing to review the appeal. My attorney advised them that simply because their IT department decides to hold up all electronic correspondence for three days does n't mean they can use that as an excuse to evade review of a validly submitted appeal. SPS is unwilling to consider my appeal. My attorney states they are in violation of Respa Reg X ( 1024.41 ) and are in fact evading review. Please enforce any penalties against SPS for violating this Respa law. This is not only unethical they would hold my application for appeal past the appeal date, but it appears to also be illegal.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
State: NV
Zip: 89135
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-12-01
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-11-30
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: As the result of the complaint I filed against XXXX and they sold my Loan to Select Portfolio Servicing , Inc with my monthly mortgage still going up. They want me to pay XXXX a month for a house valued at XXXX maximum. I am petrified to try again to get a loan modified or try keep my home. I contacted a counsel from the Homeowner Hotline she and I spoke with representation for Select Portfolio Servicing , Inc. asking for a short sale. They agreed finally and gave me XXXX XXXX a Real Estate Agent they use from out of Georgia. He came out to my house, took pictures and place them in XXXX along with a sign in my yard and a key in the lock box on my door. Select Portfolio Servicing is telling me that they did agree to the short sale or any other arrangement relating to my house. I have taken all of their calls early in the morning and in the evening hours repeating my intentions and sending any required documentation to them. My desired resolution is to put all of this behind me and the opportunity for a short sale.
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
State: GA
Zip: 30331
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-11-30
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-11-30
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: XXXX [ [ Reference to my property located at XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX, NC XXXXLoan # XXXX Serviced by Select Portfolio Servicing. Relationship. Person of Contact is XXXX XXXX, Relationship Manager, XXXX Extension XXXX. His email is XXXXXXXXTry and try again to contact him. Good Luck!. I have NOT been able to contact him. ***************************************************************************************************This is concerning the papers I sign for the Deed-In-Lieu. I sign XXXX different pages and was given copies of all pages NOT sign by me. I met a Notary Public in XXXX, NC. Met at XXXX off XXXX XXXX on Saturday XXXX XXXX, 2015. Ever since that day, I have requested a copy of the pages I sign and I have received NO response from anyone. Emails to XXXX XXXX were sent in multiple days. Last email sent was just before XXXX. I have copies of other attempts to contact dated XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, and others. I have made more than XXXX calls to SPS and it is a joke. I made sure that the conversations were recorded. It seems that SPS and the staff have no real desire to finish what they started.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I signed the Deed-In-Lieu paper
Company Response: Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law
State: NC
Zip: 28314
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-11-30
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No