Date Received: 2015-06-19
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: Court Case XXXX XXXX was a foreclosure case between HSBC and XXXX XXXX XXXX and not XXXX although XXXX XXXX XXXX represented XXXX. We were summoned to Court on XXXX XXXX, XXXX dealing with foreclosure. We havedocuments from XXXX showing that your relationship began with XXXX as XXXX XXXX XXXX and not XXXX XXXX, XXXX. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX before a Sheriff sale you verified your sale from XXXX to theFederal Reserve Bank XXXX XXXX dismissing your involvement with us. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX you appeared again with a Sheriff sale. XXXX XXXX, XXXX HSBC received confirmation of your Sheriff Sale. We have no reason to address XXXX because you stated on many times thatyou were the owner. You simply as the owner has been able to fraudulently XXXX XXXX Mortgage in XXXX in Ok ) sell property on ( XXXX XXXX different occasions and thereforewe scream XXXX jeopardy and mortgage fraud. We have shown that no mortgage existed and therefore believe that HSBC owes usour Truth-in- Lending amount from XXXX of {$480000.00}.
Company Response:
State: OK
Zip: 731XX
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-06-24
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-06-17
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: HSBC is refusing to accept Qualified Written Requests ( " QWR '' ) under Section 6 of RESPA. HSBC sent me a notice that it had transferred the administration of my loan to XXXX, and that any QWR was to be mailed to an address of XXXX. A copy of the notice is attached. I wrote HSBC a QWR in XXXX XXXX. I mailed it and faxed it. I also filed a complaint with the CFPB. My XXXX tax payments were in arrears, although I had paid for them through my escrow account. I received a letter back from HSBC in XXXX XXXX, stating that the bank got my CFPB complaint, and my fax to its service center. However, HSBC claimed it did not receive a copy of my letter to the address it specified for QWR 's ( XXXX XXXX XXXX ). That is a DIFFERENT address from the notice they had sent to me before. They discussed my issues from CFPB, but said they would " not consider [ my letter ] to be a QWR as defined in Section 6 of RESPA. '' A copy of HSBC 's letter is attached. I sent HSBC another QWR in XXXX XXXX, and again filed a complaint with the CFPB. My taxes had still not been paid from my escrow account, and my house was now in foreclosure. I sent the letter to the XXXX XXXX XXXX address HSBC had said it designated for QWR 's. A copy of the certified mail receipt is attached. Yet, I received a response letter from HSBC in XXXX XXXX, AGAIN stating that they had not gotten it at the proper address and that they would therefore " not consider it to be a QWR as defined in Section XXXX of RESPA. '' A copy of HSBC 's letter is attached. I want to know that my letters from XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX are each QWR 's. I want confirmation that the XXXX XXXX letter in particular was received by the proper unit designated to receive it. I also want an explanation why a CFPB complaint or a complaint to any HSBC service center does not get treated as a QWR under law. I do not want HSBC acting as if it can selectively ignore RESPA by denying complaints QWR status. Thank you.
Company Response:
State: NY
Zip: 105XX
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-06-22
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-06-17
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: The mortgage service company refuses to reduce my monthly payments or interest amount due even though I have made extra payments to pay down principal. My outstanding principal on XXXX XXXX, 2005 was approximately {$360000.00}. I made {$25000.00} worth of principal payments on XXXX XXXX, 2005 and another {$1000.00} in principal payments on XXXX XXXX, 2005, but they refuse to recalculate the monthly amount due and have continued to charge interest on the principal amount of {$360000.00}. They claim that they will make XXXX only adjustment to monthly payment amounts per year and will require notarized documents in order to do so. Furthermore, if I want to make additional payments against principal, I need to do it before the XXXX of the current month in order to go into effect XXXX days later. These are ridiculously deceptive practices. If I pay down the principal of my loan, they should not continue to charge me interest on the previous amount. Furthermore, they should not have to make me jump through hoops such as notarized documents in order to pay down a loan, nor should they hold on to my money for 45 days and still charge me interest on the principal.
Company Response:
State: FL
Zip: 33134
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-06-22
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-06-17
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: Re : XXXX XXXX XXXX, SS # XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, MA XXXX : XXXX Second Mortgage, XXXX XXXX, XXXX, Book XXXX, Page XXXX Satisfaction and Discharge of Mortgage, XXXX XXXX, XXXX, Book XXXX, Page XXXX for Mortgage, XXXX XXXX, XXXX, Book XXXX, Page XXXX Whom It May Concern : This complaint and attached documentation is to prove the Expiration of the Statute of Limitations, inaccurate, fraudulent Charge Off credit reporting, and denial of credit and selling of HBSC account to XXXX XXXX XXXX as Statute of Limitations has expired for the above referenced XXXX XXXX XXXX. HBSC did not accurately report payment history of accounts and I request the information be removed from Credit Reporting agencies. Sincerely, XXXX XXXX XXXX
Company Response:
State: MA
Zip: 01970
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-06-17
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-06-17
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: HFC, Member HSBC Group, XXXX. XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX:1. Refinanced my original mortgage, {$140000.00} XX/XX/XXXX and consolidated XXXX mortgage for {$60000.00} into new principal balance of {$210000.00}. Reported the {$68000.00} XXXX mortgage as Charged Off and sold it to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, Attn : XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX has me in Collections and the inaccurate information is being reported as Negative and effecting my XXXX Score in a very negative manner. 2. My original mortgage did not have the provision to pay Real Estate Taxes but HFC paid {$10000.00} to a parcel in the City of XXXX and charged me with an additional {$10000.00} thus increasing my principal balance to {$220000.00}. I have been disputing this fact since XX/XX/XXXX and have not received resolution. 3. HFC did not report to any Credit Bureaus from XX/XX/XXXX to current and there are ( XXXX ) XXXX days past due on my Credit Report. 4. I refinanced with HFC in XX/XX/XXXX, paid on time, and HFC did not report new mortgage and reports as XXXX+ days past due.
Company Response:
State: MA
Zip: 01970
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-06-17
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-06-17
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: I have a home equity loan with HSBC Mortgage Service Center XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX : XXXX XXXX, Mt XXXX, NJ XXXX ). On XX/XX/XXXX, 2013, I made a XXXX check payment of {$6000.00} towards my loan. According to HSBC 's payment policy indicated on their payment coupon, any amount above the monthly payment will be applied to the principle, but HSBC wrongfully apply the extra amount to XXXX times of interest and principle. I called them on this mistake, they admit this mistake, but intend to confuse me with mistaken calculations. This practice is absolutely not acceptable! The amount they should deduct from my account 's principle is {$1300.00}. Please instruct them to correct this mistake ASAP. Thanks!
Company Response:
State: CA
Zip: 95129
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-06-19
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-06-16
Issue: Other
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: I sent a letter to HSBC Bank inquiring about a account that they listed on my credit reports, which I do not recognize. The account number is listed as XXXX. I disputed their reporting reporting of this account under FACTA rules and regulations. I wanted a FACTA request for a complete accounting of account. I asked them for the date and amount of each and every charge, payment, or adjustment made on the referenced acct. I also told them that under FACTA, they must either provide me the requested info or delete this acct from all credit reports. To this date HSBC Bank has not provided me this information.
Company Response:
State: FL
Zip: 33065
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-06-16
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-06-16
Issue: False statements or representation
Subissue: Impersonated an attorney or official
Consumer Complaint: I have been repeatedly called my a company who has left voicemails stating that it was an alert message notification and that I needed to call XXXX to provide my statement. I did not return the phone calls. On the morning of XXXX XXXX, 2016, I received at phone call at XXXX from an unknown number. I answered the call. A lady spoke to me and asked me if I was XXXX XXXX and I said yes. She asked if my address was XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and I said no, and then asked what this was regarding. She said that legal paperwork had been delivered to that address for me and since I had not responded they were attempting to get a response from me. I asked what sort of legal paperwork and was told it was a complaint filed with the XXXX XXXX Sheriff 's Office. I said again that I had not received any paperwork. She transferred me to the " legal department '' where a man then picked up the phone. I again verified that the address was incorrect and asked what this was regarding. I was told that it was regarding an account of mine that was in collections and had been transferred to this law firm. He said it was regarding an accounts previously had with XXXX XXXX for the amount of {$1300.00}. He stated that he was going to email me paperwork that would require my electronic signature to agree to voluntary repayment in order to stop further legal action. He asked me to make a verbal agreement on a recorded line to make payments on this account. I told him I would not make any agreement without proper notification and delivery of paperwork. At that time, he told me that he was going to send out the email and would need an immediate response. He listed the name as XXXX XXXX and that his direct line is XXXX. I gave him my email address and was told he would email the document in XXXX mins. He asked me again to verbally agree to payments and I again stated no. At this time, he stated that he wished me the best of luck when we went to court and hung up on me. A few hours later I received an email with an electronic document attached. This document stated that immediate payment of the full amount was due today to prevent further legal action. After the phone call, I determined that I did previously have a joint account with XXXX XXXX with my exhusband that had been sent to collections, however this account has been paid in full. I also researched the numbers listed and have found them to be listed as fraudulent on many websites. The address listed appears to be a motel in XXXX XXXX CA. At this time, I am unsure what I can do to stop the harassing phone calls. I also concerned that these people have my personal credit information.
Company Response:
State: NV
Zip: 89436
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-06-16
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-06-16
Issue: Application, originator, mortgage broker
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: Hello, My Name is XXXX XXXX and I am a home owner with a mortgage through HSBC. I have never missed a payment on my mortgage and was late XXXX due to a mistake. I am in dire straits. I am having to XXXX XXXX to pay XXXX, and things are getting tight, I have been trying to get my mortgage refinanced at as low a rate as possible with no PMI since XXXX 2014. I have lost XXXX. Your assistance would be appreciated. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Company Response:
State: IL
Zip: 610XX
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-06-16
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2015-06-16
Issue: Taking/threatening an illegal action
Subissue: Threatened to sue on too old debt
Consumer Complaint: i received a call from a lady named XXXX with the phone number XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and shed said they were issuing a subpoena for court to be sued. She then directed me to call XXXX XXXX XXXX to see the reason why i was being sued. XXXX then asked for the number XXXX gave me which was XXXX XXXX XXXX so i gave that to her and she came back to me with the reason i was being sued was for a debt with HSBC which was a credit card debt that was back in XXXX they have called me XXXX times threatening on this matter. telling me that the debt will XXXX if they have to take me to court and trying to force me to pay the {$1400.00} something that i owe. my dad private attroney said to file a complaint
Company Response:
State: FL
Zip: 32117
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2015-06-16
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No