Date Received: 2016-07-05
Issue: Application, originator, mortgage broker
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: Hello, My name is XXXX and XXXX XXXX. This is most likely the 4-5th complaint against my mortgage company SLS. I just recently placed a case against them last week and here is another. I was in another short sale offer for the sale of my home for the past XXXX months. Recently-XXXXdays ago SLS called me aking for the FUNDING PROOF OF THE BUYER to be sent to them for review. I stated that it was my lawyer that they should be calling but I would contact them to request that inwhich I did that day. My lawyer in turn replyed and said she got that sent that day also to SLS and even asked them if anything else was needed. They said that was all they needed to proceed. Today I received an e-mail from SLS stating that my short sale was denied because of buyer funding proof and untimely grounds!!!! I e-mailed lawyer to explain. She stated she sent it XXXX days ago as requested and they received it. SLS is full of XXXX what gives them the right to even stay in business!!! They have really really really done a job on us!!! Why am I stuck with them and how do I press charges against them for neglect on our XXXXx in a YEAR SHORT SALE DENIAL!!! How do I get JUSTICE? Who do I call? I need to take serious action!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! XXXX
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
State: NY
Zip: 14223
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2016-07-05
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2016-07-04
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: XXXX XXXX, XXXX Dispute Late Charges -- Specialized Loan Servicing -- Loan # XXXX To Whom It Concern : servicing company is Specialized Loan Servicing. The underlying lender is XXXX XXXX. It was a 10 year interest only with a balloon payment due XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. Due to a number of unforeseen circumstances including the housing bust, we experienced a difficult financial period. We had XXXX collections that were on our credit report for quite a while. Finally in the XXXX, we were able to pay off the collections and start to rebuild our credit scores. We understood this would be necessary in order to obtain a loan modification. Finally, in XXXX XXXX, our scores were above XXXX after being in the low XXXX. We were advised to contact the servicer of our HELOC loan and negotiate a modification with them. We did this. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX, the first package of documents were emailed to Specialized Loan Servicing ( SLS ) requesting a modification. Over the next eight months documents were submitted when requested. Finally on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX we received a notice that our request was denied due to the loan being a HELOC. It is our contention that SLS failed to negotiate in good faith. They knew from the very beginning that the loan was a HELOC and could have advised us of not being able to modify it in XXXX XXXX or XXXX at the latest. Instead they chose to prolong this over eight months while charging us with late payments each month. They have now single handedly destroyed our credit to the point that we are not able to obtain another loan to pay this XXXX off. We have contacted several lenders, including private money lenders, and due to the late charges, we can not obtain a loan. It appears that their goal is to put us into foreclosure. We do not want to lose our home of 14 years. We could have easily obtained a loan in XXXX or XXXX had we know they were not going to modify the existing HELOC. As a gesture of good faith, we continued to make the interest payments for XXXX and XXXX based on the bills we continued to receive from SLS during the negotiation period. A payment was made on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX in the amount of {$300.00}. A second payment of {$250.00} was made on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. The XXXX/XXXX/XXXX payment was returned to our account on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. XXXX/XXXX/XXXX payment returned on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. When I questioned this, I was told by a SLS representative that they would not accept any payments that were not the full amount. They could have easily told me at that time that they would not do a modification on a HELOC. Again, we do not feel that SLS has negotiated in good faith, they knew from the start the loan was a HELOC and their policy not to modify a HELOC and they deliberately prolonged the negotiation period to allow them to systematically destroy our credit rating with late payment charges. We respectfully request these late charges be removed, our credit ratings be restored and in order for us be able to obtain a new loan to pay off this HELOC.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
State: OR
Zip: 97526
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2016-07-06
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2016-07-02
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: SLS has not applied two payments made on XXXX/XXXX/2016 and XXXX/XXXX/2016 to our mortgage account. Both payments were made electronically using a service called XXXX. We have paid our mortgage payment using this same process for over 5 years and have not had this issue in the past. We have contacted them numerous times ( 10+ ) and submitted documentation showing the money has come out of our checking account yet they have not given us credit. They have not called us once since our initial call on XXXX XXXX and have not acknowledged receipt of any of our documentation until I call them to verify that this documentation has been received by them. I have had to pay XXXX additional monthly payments for the two months ( XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX ) to get the account out of arrears and requested this amount of {$3600.00} ( equal to two months of payments ) be refunded to us since I have paid XXXX payments for 2 months. No one is taking responsibility to get this done. Their billing statement has a " Error XXXX and Requests for Information '' section which references that borrowers have certain rights under Federal law relating to resolving disputes and says you can learn more about this on their website but there is nothing that I can find on their website that gives information on this. They also list their phone # but when I was talking to XXXX, a Supervisor in Executive Services Department he did n't answer the questions I asked about them having 30 days to resolve or respond to my inquiry and request.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
State: CA
Zip: 94598
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2016-07-02
Company Response to Consumer: Closed
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: Yes
Date Received: 2016-07-01
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: While closing mortgage, Specialized loan servicing LLC deducted extra future months interest and refused to return the excess interest. Payoff quote from Specialized loan servicing LLC on XXXX/XXXX/16 stated the total amount due was {$390000.00} which includes interest up to XXXX/XXXX/16. When XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX tried to payoff the loan, the title company wired the amount of {$390000.00} which include the interest up to XXXX/XXXX/16. Specialized loan servicing LLC did not process the payment as payoff, instead deducted three months of interest and treated the rest amount as additional principal. The XXXX deducted interest amounts on XXXX/XXXX/16 are : {$1200.00} for XXXX, {$1200.00} for XXXX and {$1200.00} for XXXX. And the loan status changed with the principal balance remaining as {$5200.00} along with the escrow balance of {$3600.00} as of XXXX/XXXX/16. As suggested by title company, we went ahead to payoff using the new payoff quote as of XXXX/XXXX/16 which is amount of {$1600.00}. We wired the amount of {$1600.00} to the specialized loan servicing and the loan is closed on XXXX/XXXX/16. We expected to receive the excess interest payment refund of XXXX for XXXX plus the interest difference after XXXX/XXXX/16 however we received only {$61.00} for the interest refund. The amount of {$1500.00} should be refunded as the excess interest paid for non existing loan amount. Our calculation for remaining excess interest taken from title company 's payment on XXXX/XXXX/16 : ( From payoff quote ) daily per diem interest amount as of XXXX/XXXX/16 : {$41.00} ( From payoff quote ) daily per diem interest amount as of XXXX/XXXX/16 : {$0.00} Excess interest for XXXX ( $ XXXX {$0.00} ) XXXX {$360.00} Excess interest for XXXX : {$1200.00} Refund from payoff : {$61.00} Remaining excess interest to be refunded : {$1500.00} ( $ XXXX $ XXXX {$61.00} ) Specialized loan servicing also refunded XXXX XXXX property tax payment amount of {$4800.00} which was deducted from the escrow account on XXXX/XXXX/16 however the tax payment did not reach to XXXX XXXX XXXX before the title company 's payment which was made on XXXX/XXXX/16. We have contacted XXXX XXXX and the only XXXX XXXX received was from First American title company and there is no evidence of Specialized loan servicing 's payment. Specialized loan servicing is stating that the refund check of {$4800.00} also includes the excess interest refund however it is not true. The interest refund is still in short of {$1500.00}. We would like to request a refund check of {$1500.00}.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
State: CA
Zip: 95136
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2016-07-01
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2016-06-30
Issue: Settlement process and costs
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: Searching for original loan agreement, unable to reach correct department at Bank of New York Mellon, this Bank is Trustee/holder of XXXX XXXX Trust. This Bank should have copy of note.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
State: NC
Zip: 28451
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2016-07-19
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: Yes
Date Received: 2016-06-29
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: I am sending XXXX attachment. But i noticed it said fake path. Since I began making reports to CFPB, I notice a redirect when I have sent documents to you. As of yesterday, I was hoping it was repaired. If I do not hear from you, I will call shortly. In a XXXX XXXX, 2016 correspondence from specialized loan servicing company ( SLS ), the company stated XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, Asset-Backed Certificates, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, as Trustee is my current creditor with whom the debt of XXXX is owed. SLS stated that the amount of debt as of XXXX XXXX, 2016, is the unpaid principal balance ( PB ) of the first mortgage : {$46000.00} and includes the deferred principal balance : {$78000.00} There is a late fee, advanced escrow fees, and some uncollected interest also owed. To bring more clarity to this matter, I am asking Specialized Loan Servicing ( SLS ) to provide me with, again, 1. Name of company to whom I owe the {$120.00}, XXXX, Address, Telephone Number, Loan Account Number, and provide a first and last name of a person to contact, along with extension number if he/she has one.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
State: MA
Zip: 01109
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2016-06-29
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2016-06-28
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: My Lender-SLS has been in the 'process ' of a the 5th short sale offered on my home within a year time. The problem is when the these last offers came in I requested CASH FOR KEYS XX/XX/XXXX and they told me to submit a utility bill and request. So I did. Then 2 months went by and we talked and they said they never rec 'd it. So I -emailed another request. 1 month goes by and they call me stating they only got XXXX page. So I do it again. another month goes by and I talk to them still they never rec 'd it. Well then I fax it again 3 weeks ago. I get a call from them. I ask if they got it. She says yes- However, that program ended in XXXX 2015 and we are not elligable. Im totally stunned - unprofessional. Why would I be led on and why would n't they offer anything else? Is their any other programs for relocation/transition assistance? I have searched on line. I am not XXXX XXXX or XXXX.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
State: NY
Zip: 14223
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2016-06-28
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: Yes
Date Received: 2016-06-28
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: Since XXXX I have made more than the payment amount, but it has not been added to the outstanding principal as requested. Instead the mortgage companies push back the payment date which allows the outstanding balance to accrue interest. Which keeps my balance high.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
State: NY
Zip: 109XX
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2016-06-28
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: Yes
Date Received: 2016-06-24
Issue: Loan modification,collection,foreclosure
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: I have been attempting to obtain a loan modification for over a year from SLS. They assumed my loan from XXXX XXXX XXXX 2 years ago. I have made several overtures to this company to secure a loan modification. In XXXX 2016 I reached out to them again requesting status request. The response was requested documents had not been received, modification had not been approved. I requested documentation be sent to me to reference to. A letter formally requesting further consideration would be required. I sent formal letter. I have since called to request documentation and customer service representative XXXX stated modification request was denied. I requested that documentation and was told SLS would not provide any further documentation and if I wished further info to go to SLS website. This is very unfair and appears to be placing obstacles in my bankruptcy consideration.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
State:
Zip: XXXXX
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2016-06-24
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No
Date Received: 2016-06-24
Issue: Loan servicing, payments, escrow account
Subissue:
Consumer Complaint: SLS, a debt collector, has been violating the FDCPA repeatedly. XXXX instance is their continued correspondence to an attorney who no longer represents me. .Despite notice given to them on XXXX/XXXX/16, they ignored it and sent said attorney correspondence on XXXX/XXXX/16, XXXX/XXXX/16 and XXXX/XXXX/16. This is XXXX XXXX of a myriad of violations.
Company Response: Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response
State: CT
Zip: 06880
Submitted Via: Web
Date Sent: 2016-06-24
Company Response to Consumer: Closed with explanation
Timely Response: Yes
Consumer Disputed: No